Skip to main content

Table 2 Main results when maximizing different profits for biogas supply network with larger capacity

From: Optimization of biogas supply networks considering multiple objectives and auction trading prices of electricity

 

Max PEconomic

Max \( {P}^{Economi{c}^{+ GHG}} \)

Max PSustainability b

Feedstock (t/y)

 Corn grain

18,838

18,838

18,251

 Corn silage

/

/

1200

 Corn stover

12,844

12,844

12,444

 Grass silage

11,080

11,244

55,158

 Poultry bedding

4808

5635

1026

 Poultry manure

49,895

49,656

125,313

 Poultry slurry

/

/

32,413

Total feedstock

97,464

98,216

245,804

Products

 Electricity (MWh/y)

34,730

34,925

43,376 | 43,437

 Heat (MWh/y)

24,662

24,849

51,366 | 51,439

 Digestate (23% dry solids, t/y)

76,493

77,106

90,468 | 91,332

 Corn grain (direct product)

18,206

18,206

17,639

Water (t/y)

 Purchased

26,902

26,892

63,624

 Recycled

71,981

75,306

738,432

Utilities required (MWh/y)

Electricity “recycled”

2197

2283

6968

Electricity purchased

767

703

/

Heat “recycled”

7039

7093

16,549

Heat source purchased

/

/

/

Sustainability items ($/y)

 Economic profit

− 659,523

− 660,736

−3,675,154

 Eco-profit

− 993,356

1,608,143

6,302,895

 Social Profit

147,697

148,441

334,676

 Sustainability profit

−1,505,181

1,095,848

2,962,417

 Economic+GHG profit

− 454,124

−441,056

−3,214,145

CO2 eq. emissions (t/y)a

− 7721

− 8259

−17,331

 Selected Site

I

I

I, III

 Dry matter content (%)

12.54

12.32

5.90 | 5.93

 Methane content (%)

57.55

57.53

55.85 | 55.93

  1. aavoided GHG emissions
  2. b if not specified for each biogas supply network separated, results present the sum from both networks