Skip to main content

Table 1 Main results when maximizing different profits for biogas supply network with smaller capacity (1 ± 0.1 MW in average electricity production)

From: Optimization of biogas supply networks considering multiple objectives and auction trading prices of electricity

 

Max PEconomic

Max \( {P}^{Economi{c}^{+ GHG}} \)

Max PSustainability b

Feedstock (t/y)

 Corn grain

7488

7488

11,820

 Corn silage

/

/

14,354

 Corn stover

5105

5105

8059

 Poultry bedding

9355

9355

/

 Poultry manure

2236

2236

25,505

 Poultry slurry

/

/

25,463

Total feedstock

21,949

21,949

85,200

Products

 Electricity (MWh/y)

8386

8368

23,968

 Heat (MWh/y)

5955

5955

17,378

 Digestate (23% dry solids, t/y)

13,353

13,399

48,749

 Corn grain (direct product)

7239

7239

11,424

Water (t/y)

 Purchased

3230

3230

213

 Recycled

11,503

11,503

46,438

Utilities required (MWh/y)

Electricity “recycled”

531

548

2092

Electricity purchased

185

168

/

Heat “recycled”

1700

1700

4968

Heat source purchased

/

/

/

Sustainability item ($/y)

 Economic profit

− 548,346

−548,452

−2,323,475

 Eco-profit

− 113,681

321,269

2,802,824

 Social profit

77,456

77,456

230,344

 Sustainability profit

− 584,572

− 149,728

709,692

 Economic+GHG profit

−500,291

− 498,191

−2,157,453

CO2 eq. emissions (t/y)a

− 1807

− 1890

− 6241

 Selected Site

I

I

I, II, III

 Dry matter content (%)

13

13

12.06|11.97|11.91

 Methane content (%)

56.18

56.18

55.87|56.36|56.92

  1. aavoided GHG emissions
  2. b if not specified for each biogas supply network separated, results present the sum from both networks