Shell Energy Transition Report. 2018. https://www.shell.com/energy-and-innovation/the-energy-future/shell-energy-transition-report.html. Accessed 5 Feb 2019.

BP Energy Outlook 2018 Edition. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/energy-outlook.html. Accessed 5 Feb 2019.

International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook. 2017. https://www.iea.org/weo2017/. Accessed 5 Feb 2019.

IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/. Accessed 5 Feb 2019.

Liu P, Pistikopoulos EN, Li Z. Energy systems engineering: methodologies and applications. Front Energy Power Eng China. 2010; 4(2):131–42.

Article
Google Scholar

Sheu EJ, Mitsos A, Eter AA, Mokheimer EM, Habib MA, Al-Qutub A. A review of hybrid solar–fossil fuel power generation systems and performance metrics. J Solar Energy Eng. 2012; 134(4):041006.

Article
Google Scholar

Mitsos A, Asprion N, Floudas CA, Bortz M, Baldea M, Bonvin D, Caspari A, Schaefer P. Challenges in process optimization for new feedstocks and energy sources. Comput Chem Eng. 2018; 113:209–21.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

ExxonMobil 2018 Outlook for Energy: A View to 2040. https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/energy/energy-outlook/a-view-to-2040. Accessed 5 Feb 2019.

Liu P, Georgiadis MC, Pistikopoulos EN. Advances in energy systems engineering. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011; 50:4915–25.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Floudas CA, Niziolek AM, Onel O, Matthews LR. Multi-scale systems engineering for energy and the environment: Challenges and opportunities. AIChE J. 2016; 62(3):602–23.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Grossmann IE. Mixed-integer programming approach for the synthesis of integrated process flowsheets. Comput Chem Eng. 1985; 9(5):463–82.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Martin M, Adams TA. Future directions in process and product synthesis and design In: Eden MR, Ierapetritou MG, Towler GP, editors. 13th International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering (PSE 2018). Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, vol. 44. San Diego: Elsevier: 2018. p. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64241-7.50001-X. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978044464241750001X.

Floudas CA. Nonlinear and Mixed-Integer Optimization. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.

Google Scholar

Biegler LT, Grossmann IE, Westerberg AW. Systematic Methods for Chemical Process Design. Old Tappan: Prentice Hall; 1997.

Google Scholar

Georgiadis MC, Kikkinides ES, Pistikopoulos EN. Energy Systems Engineering, vol. 5. Weinheim: Wiley; 2008.

Google Scholar

Biegler LT, Lang Y-d, Lin W. Multi-scale optimization for process systems engineering. Comput Chem Eng. 2014; 60:17–30.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Baliban RC, Elia JA, Floudas CA. Toward novel biomass, coal, and natural gas processes for satisfying current transportation fuel demands, 1: Process alternatives, gasification modeling, process simulation, and economic analysis. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010; 49(16):7343–70.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Elia JA, Baliban RC, Floudas CA. Toward novel biomass, coal, and natural gas processes for satisfying current transportation fuel demands, 2: Simultaneous heat and power integration. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010; 49(16):7371–88.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Elia JA, Baliban RC, Floudas CA. Nationwide, regional, and statewide energy supply chain optimization for natural gas to liquid transportation fuel (gtl) systems. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013; 53(13):5366–97.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Elia JA, Baliban RC, Floudas CA. Nationwide energy supply chain analysis for hybrid feedstock processes with significant co2 emissions reduction. AIChE J. 2012; 58(7):2142–54.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Onel O, Niziolek AM, Floudas CA. Integrated biomass and fossil fuel systems towards the production of fuels and chemicals: state of the art approaches and future challenges. Curr Opin Chem Eng. 2015; 9:66–74.

Article
Google Scholar

Onel O, Niziolek AM, Hasan MMF, Floudas CA. Municipal solid waste to liquid transportation fuels - Part I: Mathematical modeling of a municipal solid waste gasifier. Comput Chem Eng. 2014; 71(0):636–47.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Georgiadis MC, Pistikopoulos EN. Integrated optimization of oil and gas production In: Georgiadis MC, Kikkinides ES, Pistikopoulos EN, editors. Process Systems Engineering Volume 5: Energy Systems Engineering. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmBH & Co. KGaA: 2008.

Chapter
Google Scholar

Cafaro DC, Grossmann IE. Strategic planning, design, and development of the shale gas supply chain network. AIChE J. 2014; 60(6):2122–42.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Drouven MG, Grossmann IE, Cafaro DC. Stochastic programming models for optimal shale well development and refracturing planning under uncertainty. AIChE J. 2017; 63(11):4799–813.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Siddhamshetty P, Wu K, Kwon JS-I. Optimization of simultaneously propagating multiple fractures in hydraulic fracturing to achieve uniform growth using data-based model reduction. Chem Eng Res Des. 2018; 136:675–86.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Martín M, Grossmann IE. On the systematic synthesis of sustainable biorefineries. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013; 52(9):3044–64.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Kelloway A, Daoutidis P. Process synthesis of biorefineries: Optimization of biomass conversion to fuels and chemicals. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014; 53(13):5261–73.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Matthews LR, Niziolek AM, Onel O, Pinnaduwage N, Floudas CA. Biomass to liquid transportation fuels via biological and thermochemical conversion: Process synthesis and global optimization strategies. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2016; 55(12):3203–25.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Liu P, Pistikopoulos EN, Li Z. An energy systems engineering approach to the optimal design of energy systems in commercial buildings. Energy Pol. 2010; 38(8):4224–31.

Article
Google Scholar

Maréchal F, Weber C, Favrat D. Multiobjective design and optimization of urban energy systems In: S E, Pistikopoulos EN, Georgiadis MC, Dua V, editors. Process Systems Engineering. Weinheim: Wiley: 2014. p. 39–83.

Google Scholar

Cheng R, Xu Z, Liu P, Wang Z, Li Z, Jones I. A multi-region optimization planning model for china’s power sector. Appl Energy. 2015; 137:413–26.

Article
Google Scholar

Acha S, Mariaud A, Shah N, Markides CN. Optimal design and operation of distributed low-carbon energy technologies in commercial buildings. Energy. 2018; 142:578–91.

Article
Google Scholar

Subramanian A, Gundersen T, Adams T. Modeling and simulation of energy systems: A review. Processes. 2018; 6(12):238.

Article
Google Scholar

Vlachos DG. A review of multiscale analysis: examples from systems biology, materials engineering, and other fluid–surface interacting systems. Adv Chem Eng. 2005; 30:1–61.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Salciccioli M, Stamatakis M, Caratzoulas S, Vlachos DG. A review of multiscale modeling of metal-catalyzed reactions: Mechanism development for complexity and emergent behavior. Chem Eng Sci. 2011; 66(19):4319–55.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Qin SJ. Survey on data-driven industrial process monitoring and diagnosis. Ann Rev Control. 2012; 36(2):220–34.

Article
Google Scholar

Bhosekar A, Ierapetritou M. Advances in surrogate based modeling, feasibility analysis, and optimization: A review. Comput Chem Eng. 2018; 108:250–67.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Lee JH, Shin J, Realff MJ. Machine learning: Overview of the recent progresses and implications for the process systems engineering field. Comput Chem Eng. 2018; 114:111–21.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Psichogios DC, Ungar LH. A hybrid neural network-first principles approach to process modeling. AIChE J. 1992; 38(10):1499–511.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Thompson ML, Kramer MA. Modeling chemical processes using prior knowledge and neural networks. AIChE J. 1994; 40(8):1328–40.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Bhutani N, Rangaiah G, Ray A. First-principles, data-based, and hybrid modeling and optimization of an industrial hydrocracking unit. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2006; 45(23):7807–16.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Gong J, You F. Sustainable design and synthesis of energy systems. Curr Opin Chem Eng. 2015; 10:77–86.

Article
Google Scholar

Andiappan V. State-of-the-art review of mathematical optimisation approaches for synthesis of energy systems. Process Integr Optim Sustain. 2017; 1(3):165–88.

Article
Google Scholar

Heuberger CF, Staffell I, Shah N, Mac Dowell N. A systems approach to quantifying the value of power generation and energy storage technologies in future electricity networks. Comput Chem Eng. 2017; 107:247–56.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Li J, Xiao X, Boukouvala F, Floudas CA, Zhao B, Du G, Su X, Liu H. Data-driven mathematical modeling and global optimization framework for entire petrochemical planning operations. AIChE J. 2016; 62(9):3020–40.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Klatt K-U, Marquardt W. Perspectives for process systems engineering—personal views from academia and industry. Comput Chem Eng. 2009; 33(3):536–50.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Grossmann IE, Caballero JA, Yeomans H. Mathematical programming approaches to the synthesis of chemical process systems. Korean J Chem Eng. 1999; 16(4):407–26.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Nishida N, Stephanopoulos G, Westerberg AW. A review of process synthesis. AIChE J. 1981; 27(3):321–51.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Yuan Z, Chen B. Process synthesis for addressing the sustainable energy systems and environmental issues. AIChE J. 2012; 58(11):3370–89.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Furman KC, Sahinidis NV. A critical review and annotated bibliography for heat exchanger network synthesis in the 20th century. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002; 41(10):2335–70.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Odele O, Macchietto S. Computer aided molecular design: a novel method for optimal solvent selection. Fluid Phase Equilib. 1993; 82:47–54.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Churi N, Achenie LE. Novel mathematical programming model for computer aided molecular design. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1996; 35(10):3788–94.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Maranas CD. Optimal computer-aided molecular design: A polymer design case study. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1996; 35(10):3403–14.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Castro-Lacouture D, Sefair JA, Flórez L, Medaglia AL. Optimization model for the selection of materials using a leed-based green building rating system in colombia. Build Environ. 2009; 44(6):1162–70.

Article
Google Scholar

First EL, Gounaris CE, Floudas CA. Predictive framework for shape-selective separations in three-dimensional zeolites and metal–organic frameworks. Langmuir. 2013; 29(18):5599–608.

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar

Hanselman CL, Gounaris CE. A mathematical optimization framework for the design of nanopatterned surfaces. AIChE J. 2016; 62(9):3250–63.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Lutze P, Babi DK, Woodley JM, Gani R. Phenomena based methodology for process synthesis incorporating process intensification. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013; 52(22):7127–44.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Demirel SE, Li J, Hasan MF. Systematic process intensification using building blocks. Comput Chem Eng. 2017; 105:2–38.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Tian Y, Demirel SE, Hasan MF, Pistikopoulos EN. An overview of process systems engineering approaches for process intensification: State of the art. Chem Eng Processing-Process Intensif. 2018; 133:278–93.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Melo MT, Nickel S, Saldanha-Da-Gama F. Facility location and supply chain management–a review. Eur J Oper Res. 2009; 196(2):401–12.

Article
Google Scholar

Papageorgiou LG. Supply chain optimisation for the process industries: Advances and opportunities. Comput Chem Eng. 2009; 33(12):1931–8.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Hasan MF, Boukouvala F, First EL, Floudas CA. Nationwide, regional, and statewide co2 capture, utilization, and sequestration supply chain network optimization. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014; 53(18):7489–506.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Kantorovich LV. Mathematical methods of organizing and planning production. Manag Sci. 1960; 6(4):366–422.

Article
Google Scholar

Dantzig GB. Programming in a linear structure. Econometrica. 1949; 17:73–74.

Article
Google Scholar

Balas E. Disjunctive programming. Ann Discret Math. 1979; 5:3–51.

Article
Google Scholar

Lodi A. Mixed integer programming computation. In: 50 Years of Integer Programming 1958-2008. New York: Springer: 2010. p. 619–45.

Google Scholar

Bixby RE. A brief history of linear and mixed-integer programming computation. Documenta Mathematica, Extra Volume: Optimization Stories. 2012;:107–21.

Baliban RC, Elia JA, Misener R, Floudas CA. Global optimization of a minlp process synthesis model for thermochemical based conversion of hybrid coal, biomass, and natural gas to liquid fuels. Comput Chem Eng. 2012; 42:64–86.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Floudas CA. Deterministic Global Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 37. Boston: Springer; 2000.

Book
Google Scholar

Boukouvala F, Misener R, Floudas CA. Global optimization advances in mixed-integer nonlinear programming, minlp, and constrained derivative-free optimization, cdfo. Eur J Oper Res. 2016; 252(3):701–27.

Article
Google Scholar

Åström KJ, Hägglund T. PID Controllers: Theory, Design, and Tuning, vol. 2. Research Triangle Park: Instrument Society of America; 1995.

Google Scholar

Prett DM, Ramaker BL, Cutler CR. Dynamic matrix control method. 1982. USPatent 4,349,869.

Rawlings JB, Mayne DQ. Model Predictive Control: Theory and Design. Madison: Nob Hill Publishing, LLC; 2009.

Google Scholar

Bose S, Pekny J. A model predictive framework for planning and scheduling problems: a case study of consumer goods supply chain. Comput Chem Eng. 2000; 24(2-7):329–35.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Perea-Lopez E, Ydstie BE, Grossmann IE. A model predictive control strategy for supply chain optimization. Comput Chem Eng. 2003; 27(8-9):1201–18.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Subramanian K, Maravelias CT, Rawlings JB. A state-space model for chemical production scheduling. Comput Chem Eng. 2012; 47:97–110.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Dias LS, Ierapetritou MG. From process control to supply chain management: An overview of integrated decision making strategies. Comput Chem Eng. 2017; 106:826–35.

Article
Google Scholar

Daoutidis P, Lee JH, Harjunkoski I, Skogestad S, Baldea M, Georgakis C. Integrating operations and control: A perspective and roadmap for future research. Comput Chem Eng. 2018; 115:179–84.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Bellman R. The theory of dynamic programming Technical report. 1954.

De Farias DP, Van Roy B. The linear programming approach to approximate dynamic programming. Oper Res. 2003; 51(6):850–65.

Article
Google Scholar

Harjunkoski I, Maravelias CT, Bongers P, Castro PM, Engell S, Grossmann IE, Hooker J, Méndez C, Sand G, Wassick J. Scope for industrial applications of production scheduling models and solution methods. Comput Chem Eng. 2014; 62:161–93.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Biegler LT. Solution of dynamic optimization problems by successive quadratic programming and orthogonal collocation. Comput Chem Eng. 1984; 8(3-4):243–7.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Dadebo S, McAuley K. Dynamic optimization of constrained chemical engineering problems using dynamic programming. Comput Chem Eng. 1995; 19(5):513–25.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Dowling AW, Kumar R, Zavala VM. A multi-scale optimization framework for electricity market participation. Appl Energy. 2017; 190:147–64.

Article
Google Scholar

Salas DF, Powell WB. Benchmarking a scalable approximate dynamic programming algorithm for stochastic control of grid-level energy storage. INFORMS J Comput. 2018; 30(1):106–23.

Article
Google Scholar

Yuan Z, Chen B, Sin G, Gani R. State-of-the-art and progress in the optimization-based simultaneous design and control for chemical processes. AIChE J. 2012; 58(6):1640–59.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Sharifzadeh M. Integration of process design and control: A review. Chem Eng Res Des. 2013; 91(12):2515–49.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Pistikopoulos EN, Diangelakis NA, Oberdieck R, Papathanasiou MM, Nascu I, Sun M. Paroc—an integrated framework and software platform for the optimisation and advanced model-based control of process systems. Chem Eng Sci. 2015; 136:115–38.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Gal T, Greenberg H. Advances in Sensitivity Analysis and Parametric Programming International Series in Oper Res & Management Science, Vol 6. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1997.

Book
Google Scholar

Pistikopoulos EN, Diangelakis NA. Towards the integration of process design, control and scheduling: Are we getting closer?. Comput Chem Eng. 2016; 91:85–92.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Diangelakis NA, Burnak B, Katz JP, Pistikopoulos EN. Process design and control optimization: A simultaneous approach by multi-parametric programming. AIChE J. 2017; 63(11):4827–46.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Zhang Q, Martín M, Grossmann IE. Integrated design and operation of renewables-based fuels and power production networks. Comput Chem Eng. 2018.

Gabrielli P, Gazzani M, Martelli E, Mazzotti M. Optimal design of multi-energy systems with seasonal storage. Appl Energy. 2018; 219:408–24.

Article
Google Scholar

Bahl B, Lützow J, Shu D, Hollermann DE, Lampe M, Hennen M, Bardow A. Rigorous synthesis of energy systems by decomposition via time-series aggregation. Comput Chem Eng. 2018; 112:70–81.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Allman A, Palys MJ, Daoutidis P. Scheduling-informed optimal design of systems with time-varying operation: A wind-powered ammonia case study. AIChE J. 2018.

Bakshi BR, Fiksel J. The quest for sustainability: Challenges for process systems engineering. AIChE J. 2003; 49(6):1350–8.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Liu P, Pistikopoulos EN, Li Z. A multi-objective optimization approach to polygeneration energy systems design. AIChE J. 2010; 56(5):1218–34.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Fazlollahi S, Mandel P, Becker G, Maréchal F. Methods for multi-objective investment and operating optimization of complex energy systems. Energy. 2012; 45(1):12–22.

Article
Google Scholar

Pohekar S, Ramachandran M. Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—a review. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2004; 8(4):365–81.

Article
Google Scholar

Wang J-J, Jing Y-Y, Zhang C-F, Zhao J-H. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2009; 13(9):2263–78.

Article
Google Scholar

Rangaiah GP. Multi-objective Optimization: Techniques and Applications in Chemical Engineering, vol. 1. Hackensack: World Scientific; 2009.

Google Scholar

Marler RT, Arora JS. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2004; 26(6):369–95.

Article
Google Scholar

Haimes Y. On a bicriterion formulation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1971; 1(3):296–7.

Google Scholar

Pistikopoulos EN. Uncertainty in process design and operations. Comput Chem Eng. 1995; 19:553–63.

Article
Google Scholar

Sahinidis NV. Optimization under uncertainty: state-of-the-art and opportunities. Comput Chem Eng. 2004; 28(6-7):971–83.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Grossmann IE, Apap RM, Calfa BA, García-Herreros P, Zhang Q. Recent advances in mathematical programming techniques for the optimization of process systems under uncertainty. Comput Chem Eng. 2016; 91:3–14.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Kall P, Wallace SW, Kall P. Stochastic Programming. New York: Springer; 1994.

Google Scholar

Birge JR, Louveaux F. Introduction to Stochastic Programming. New York: Springer; 2011.

Book
Google Scholar

Kleywegt AJ, Shapiro A, Homem-de-Mello T. The sample average approximation method for stochastic discrete optimization. SIAM J Optim. 2002; 12(2):479–502.

Article
Google Scholar

Van Slyke RM, Wets R. L-shaped linear programs with applications to optimal control and stochastic programming. SIAM J Appl Math. 1969; 17(4):638–63.

Article
Google Scholar

Soyster AL. Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Oper Res. 1973; 21(5):1154–7.

Article
Google Scholar

Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A. Robust convex optimization. Math Oper Res. 1998; 23(4):769–805.

Article
Google Scholar

Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A. Robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Oper Res Lett. 1999; 25(1):1–13.

Article
Google Scholar

Bertsimas D, Sim M. The price of robustness. Oper Res. 2004; 52(1):35–53.

Article
Google Scholar

Li Z, Tang Q, Floudas CA. A comparative theoretical and computational study on robust counterpart optimization: Ii probabilistic guarantees on constraint satisfaction. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012; 51(19):6769–88.

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar

Guzman YA, Matthews LR, Floudas CA. New a priori and a posteriori probabilistic bounds for robust counterpart optimization: I unknown probability distributions. Comput Chem Eng. 2016; 84:568–98.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Guzman YA, Matthews LR, Floudas CA. New a priori and a posteriori probabilistic bounds for robust counterpart optimization: Ii a priori bounds for known symmetric and asymmetric probability distributions. Comput Chem Eng. 2017; 101:279–311.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Guzman YA, Matthews LR, Floudas CA. New a priori and a posteriori probabilistic bounds for robust counterpart optimization: Iii exact and near-exact a posteriori expressions for known probability distributions. Comput Chem Eng. 2017; 103:116–43.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Matthews LR, Guzman YA, Floudas CA. Generalized robust counterparts for constraints with bounded and unbounded uncertain parameters. Comput Chem Eng. 2018; 116:451–67.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Tarhan B, Grossmann IE, Goel V. Stochastic programming approach for the planning of offshore oil or gas field infrastructure under decision-dependent uncertainty. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2009; 48(6):3078–97.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Zhang Q, Grossmann IE, Heuberger CF, Sundaramoorthy A, Pinto JM. Air separation with cryogenic energy storage: optimal scheduling considering electric energy and reserve markets. AIChE J. 2015; 61(5):1547–58.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Amaran S, Zhang T, Sahinidis NV, Sharda B, Bury SJ. Medium-term maintenance turnaround planning under uncertainty for integrated chemical sites. Comput Chem Eng. 2016; 84:422–33.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Tso WW, Niziolek AM, Onel O, Demirhan CD, Floudas CA, Pistikopoulos EN. Enhancing natural gas-to-liquids (gtl) processes through chemical looping for syngas production: Process synthesis and global optimization. Comput Chem Eng. 2018; 45(23):7807–16.

Google Scholar

Beykal B, Boukouvala F, Floudas CA, Pistikopoulos EN. Optimal design of energy systems using constrained grey-box multi-objective optimization. Comput Chem Eng. 2018; 116:488–502.

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar

Tso WW, Demirhan CD, Powell JB, Pistikopoulos EN. Toward Optimal Synthesis of Renewable Ammonia and Methanol Processes (RAMP) In: Eden MR, Ierapetritou MG, Towler GP, editors. 13th International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering (PSE 2018). Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, vol. 44. San Diego: Elsevier: 2018. p. 1705–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64241-7.50279-2. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444642417502792.

Demirhan CD, Tso WW, Powell JB, Pistikopoulos EN. Sustainable ammonia production through process synthesis and global optimization. AICHE J. 2018. In press. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16498.

Niziolek AM, Onur O, Tian Y, Floudas CA, Pistikopoulos EN. Municipal solid waste to liquid transportation fuels – part iii: An optimization-based nationwide supply chain management framework. Comput Chem Eng. 2018; 116:468–87.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Ogumerem GS, Kim C, Kesisoglou I, Diangelakis NA, Pistikopoulos EN. A multi-objective optimization for the design and operation of a hydrogen network for transportation fuel. Chem Eng Res Des. 2018; 131:279–92.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Liu P, Gerogiorgis DI, Pistikopoulos EN. Modeling and optimization of polygeneration energy systems. Catal Today. 2007; 127(1-4):347–59.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Liu P, Pistikopoulos EN, Li Z. A mixed-integer optimization approach for polygeneration energy systems design. Comput Chem Eng. 2009; 33(3):759–68.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Liu P, Pistikopoulos EN, Li Z. Decomposition based stochastic programming approach for polygeneration energy systems design under uncertainty. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010; 49(7):3295–305.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Diangelakis NA, Manthanwar AM, Pistikopoulos EN. A framework for design and control optimisation. application on a chp system. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, vol. 34. Cle Elum, Washington: Elsevier: 2014. p. 765–770.

Google Scholar

Diangelakis NA, Pistikopoulos EN. Modelling, design and control optimization of a residential scale chp system In: Kopanos GM, Liu P, Georgiadis MC, editors. Advances in Energy Systems Engineering. Weinheim: Springer: 2017.

Google Scholar

Panos C, Kouramas KI, Georgiadis MC, Pistikopoulos EN. Modelling and explicit model predictive control for pem fuel cell systems. Chem Eng Sci. 2012; 67(1):15–25.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Zhao Y, Pistikopoulos EN. Dynamic modelling and parametric control for the polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell system. J of Power Sources. 2013; 232:270–8.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Ziogou C, Pistikopoulos EN, Georgiadis MC, Voutetakis S, Papadopoulou S. Empowering the performance of advanced nmpc by multiparametric programming - an application to a pem fuel cell system. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013; 52(13):4863–73.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Ogumerem GS, Pistikopoulos EN. Dynamic modeling, optimization and explicit control of a pem water electrolysis process. Smart Sust Manuf Syst. 2018; 2:25–43.

Google Scholar

Avraamidou S, Milhorn A, Sarwar O, Pistikopoulos EN. Towards a quantitative food-energy-water nexus metric to facilitate decision making in process systems: A case study on a dairy production plant. In: 28th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process Engineering (ESCAPE-28), vol. 43. Graz, Austria: Elsevier: 2018. p. 391–6.

Google Scholar

Avraamidou S, Beykal B, Pistikopoulos I, Pistikopoulos EN. A hierarchical food-energy-water nexus (few-n) decision-making approach for land use optimization. In: 13th International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering (PSE 2018). San Diego: Elsevier: 2018. p. 1885–90.

Google Scholar

Nie Y, Avraamidou S, Li J, Xiao X, Pistikopoulos EN. Land use modeling and optimization based on food-energy-water nexus: a case study on crop-livestock systems. In: 13th International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering (PSE 2018), vol. 44. San Diego: Elsevier: 2018. p. 1939–44.

Google Scholar

Onel M, Kieslich CA, Guzman YA, Floudas CA, Pistikopoulos EN. Big data approach to batch process monitoring: Simultaneous fault detection and identification using nonlinear support vector machine-based feature selection. Comput Chem Eng. 2018; 115:46–63.

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar

Onel M, Kieslich CA, Pistikopoulos EN. A nonlinear support vector machine-based feature selection approach for fault detection and diagnosis: Application to the Tennessee Eastman process. AICHE J. 2019; 65(3):992–1005. In press. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16497.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

United States Geological Survey: Nitrogen - Statistics and Information. https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/nitrogen/. Accessed 5 Feb 2019.

Department of Energy Potential Roles of Ammonia in a Hydrogen Economy: A Study of Issues Related to the Use of Ammonia for On-Board Vehicular Hydrogen Storage. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/downloads/potential-roles-ammonia-hydrogen-economy. Accessed 5 Feb 2019.

Appl M. Ammonia: Principles and Industrial Practice. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag; 1999.

Book
Google Scholar

Ammonia Production Causes 1 % of Total Global GHG Emissions. https://ammoniaindustry.com/ammonia-production-causes-1-percent-of-total-global-ghg-emissions/. Accessed 5 Feb 2019.

Baliban RC, Elia JA, Floudas CA. Optimization framework for the simultaneous process synthesis, heat and power integration of a thermochemical hybrid biomass, coal, and natural gas facility. Comput Chem Eng. 2011; 35(9):1647–90.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Baliban RC, Elia JA, Floudas CA. Simultaneous process synthesis, heat, power, and water integration of thermochemical hybrid biomass, coal, and natural gas facilities. Comput Chem Eng. 2012; 37(10):297–327.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

DOE Energy Storage. https://www.energy.gov/oe/activities/technology-development/energy-storage. Accessed 5 Feb 2019.

IRENA Energy Storage. http://www.irena.org/costs/Power-Generation-Costs/Energy-Storage. Accessed 5 Feb 2019.

IEA Technology Roadmap: Energy Storage. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/TechnologyRoadmapEnergystorage.pdf.

Chen H, Cong TN, Yang W, Tan C, Li Y, Ding Y. Progress in electrical energy storage system: A critical review. Prog Nat Sci. 2009; 19(3):291–312.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Luo X, Wang J, Dooner M, Clarke J. Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation. Appl Energy. 2015; 137:511–36.

Article
Google Scholar

Zakeri B, Syri S. Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2015; 42:569–96.

Article
Google Scholar

Mazloomi K, Gomes C. Hydrogen as an energy carrier: prospects and challenges. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2012; 16(5):3024–33.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Klerke A, Christensen CH, Nørskov JK, Vegge T. Ammonia for hydrogen storage: challenges and opportunities. J Mater Chem. 2008; 18(20):2304–10.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Wang G, Mitsos A, Marquardt W. Conceptual design of ammonia-based energy storage system: System design and time-invariant performance. AIChE J. 2017; 63(5):1620–37.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Olah GA. Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005; 44(18):2636–9.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Almansoori A, Shah N. Design and operation of a future hydrogen supply chain: multi-period model. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2009; 34(19):7883–97.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Allman A, Daoutidis P, Tiffany D, Kelley S. A framework for ammonia supply chain optimization incorporating conventional and renewable generation. AIChE J. 2017; 63(10):4390–402.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Palys MJ, Allman A, Daoutidis P. Exploring the benefits of modular renewable-powered ammonia production: A supply chain optimization study. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2018.

Tso WW, Demirhan CD, Lee SY, Song H, Powell JB, Pistikopoulos EN. Energy Carrier Supply Chain Optimization: A Texas Case Study. in press.

Ursua A, Gandia LM, Sanchis P. Hydrogen production from water electrolysis: current status and future trends. Proc IEEE. 2012; 100(2):410–26.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Carmo M, Fritz DL, Mergel J, Stolten D. A comprehensive review on pem water electrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2013; 38(12):4901–34.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Ni M, Leung MK, Leung DY. Technological development of hydrogen production by solid oxide electrolyzer cell (soec). Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2008; 33(9):2337–54.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Zeng K, Zhang D. Recent progress in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production and applications. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2010; 36(3):307–26.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Eigeldinger J, Vogt H. The bubble coverage of gas-evolving electrodes in a flowing electrolyte. Electrochim Acta. 2000; 45(27):4449–56.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Marangio F, Santarelli M, Cali M. Theoretical model and experimental analysis of a high pressure pem water electrolyser for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009; 34(3):1143–58.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Awasthi A, Scott K, Basu S. Dynamic modeling and simulation of a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2011; 36(22):14779–86.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

García-Valverde R, Espinosa N, Urbina A. Simple pem water electrolyser model and experimental validation. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2012; 37(2):1927–38.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Bemporad A, Morari M, Dua V, Pistikopoulos EN. The explicit linear quadratic regulator for constrained systems. Automatica. 2002; 38(1):3–20.

Article
Google Scholar

Chiang L, Lu B, Castillo I. Big data analytics in chemical engineering. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2017; 8:63–85.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Edgar TF, Pistikopoulos EN. Smart manufacturing and energy systems. Comput Chem Eng. 2018; 114:130–44.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Siirola JJ, Rudd DF. Computer-aided synthesis of chemical process designs from reaction path data to the process task network. Ind Eng Chem Fundam. 1971; 10(3):353–62.

Article
Google Scholar

Stephanopoulos G. Research program on artificial intelligence in process engineering. Chem Eng Educ. 1986; 20(4):182–185192.

Google Scholar

Venkatasubramanian V. Artificial intelligence in process engineering. Chem Eng Educ. 1986; 20(4):188–93.

Google Scholar

Bostrum N. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

Google Scholar

Ibm watson: How cognitive computing can be applied to big data challenges in life sciences research. Clin Ther. 2016; 38(4):688–701.

Silver D, Huang A, Maddison CJ, Guez A, Sifre L, Van Den Driessche G, Schrittwieser J, Antonoglou I, Panneershelvam V, Lanctot M, Dieleman S, Grewe D, Nham J, Kalchbrenner N, Sutskever I, Lillicrap T, Leach M, Kavukcuoglu K, Graepel T, Hassabis D. Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature. 2016; 529(7587):484–9.

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar

Venkatasubramanian V. The promise of artificial intelligence in chemical engineering: Is it here, finally?. AIChE J. 2019; 65(2):466–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16489. cited By 0.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Goldsmith BR, Esterhuizen J, Liu J-X, Bartel CJ, Sutton C. Machine learning for heterogeneous catalyst design and discovery. AIChE J. 2018; 64(7):2311–23.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Medford AJ, Kunz MR, Ewing SM, Borders T, Fushimi R. Extracting knowledge from data through catalysis informatics. ACS Catalysis. 2018; 8(8):7403–29.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Suresh P, Hsu S-H, Akkisetty P, Reklaitis GV, Venkatasubramanian V. Ontomodel: Ontological mathematical modeling knowledge management in pharmaceutical product development, 1: Conceptual framework. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010; 49(17):7758–67.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Toward creating an environment of cooperation between water, energy, and food stakeholders in san antonio. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 651:2913–26.

Garcia DJ, You F. The water-energy-food nexus and process systems engineering: A new focus. Comput Chem Eng. 2016; 91:49–67. 12th International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering & 25th European Symposium of Computer Aided Process Engineering (PSE-2015/ESCAPE-25), 31 May - 4 June 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

Tsay C, Pattison RC, Piana MR, Baldea M. A survey of optimal process design capabilities and practices in the chemical and petrochemical industries. Comput Chem Eng. 2018; 112:180–9.

Article
CAS
Google Scholar

The Rapid Advancement in Process Intensification Deployment (RAPID) Institute. https://www.aiche.org/rapid. Accessed 5 Feb 2019.

Clean Energy Smart Manufacturing Innovation Institute (CESMII). https://www.cesmii.org/.

Brook A, Kendrick D, Meeraus A. Gams, a user’s guide. SIGNUM Newsl. 1988; 23(3-4):10–11.

Article
Google Scholar

Fourer R, Gay DM, Kernighan B. AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming. Pacific Grove: Thomson/Cengage Learn; 2003.

Google Scholar

Hart WE, Laird C, Watson JP, Woodruff DL. Pyomo - Optimization Modeling in Python. New York: Springer; 2012.

Book
Google Scholar

Lubin M, Dunning I. Computing in operations research using julia. INFORMS J Comput. 2015; 27(2):238–48.

Article
Google Scholar

Turkay M, Grossmann IE. Logic-based minlp algorithms for the optimal synthesis of process networks. Comput Chem Eng. 1996; 20(8):959–78.

Article
Google Scholar

Grossmann IE, Ruiz JP. Generalized disjunctive programming: A framework for formulation and alternative algorithms for minlp optimization. In: Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming. New York: Springer: 2012. p. 93–115.

Google Scholar

Chen Q, Grossmann IE. Recent developments and challenges in optimization-based process synthesis. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2017; 8(1):249–83.

Article
Google Scholar